IWS - The Information Warfare Site
News Watch Make a  donation to IWS - The Information Warfare Site Use it for navigation in case java scripts are disabled

16 April 2003

U.S. Central Command Daily Briefing, April 16, 2003

(Operation Iraqi Freedom update) (8660)

Army Brigadier General Vincent Brooks, CENTCOM deputy director of
operations, briefed reporters April 16 at CENTCOM's headquarters at
Camp As Sayliyah near Doha, Qatar.

Following is a transcript of the briefing:

(begin transcript)


UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND OPERATIONAL UPDATE BRIEFING
BRIEFER: BRIGADIER GENERAL VINCENT BROOKS, CENTCOM DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
OPERATIONS
LOCATION: DOHA, QATAR
TIME: 7:05 A.M. EDT
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 2003


GEN. BROOKS: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Operation Iraqi
Freedom continues in the 27th day since coalition forces entered Iraq.
With each day that passes, more Iraqis are experiencing freedom and
more Iraqis are expressing their desires for a stable and free Iraq.

The coalition remains strong and determined to carry out the work
undertaken. We are responding to the immediate needs of the
population, securing and repairing public works and resources, and
working with the Iraqi experts and leaders to bring about lasting
improvements. Several key objectives have been attained. More remain
ahead of us, and the progress toward attainment is steady and the
outcome is certain. Dangers remain, and our coalition soldiers,
sailors, airmen, Marines, and civilians continue to confront them with
courage and compassion.

Lives are still being lost in the cause of freedom, and we honor the
memory of those who have died, and we continue to remember those loved
ones of all those who have lost their lives.

Coalition special operations forces continue to be a key ingredient of
the coalition efforts to deny free movement to former regime members,
to secure key facilities, and to enable other coalition operations.
Coalition special operations forces are actively breaking the Iraqi
links to terrorists. On the night of 14 April 2003, coalition special
operations forces, supported by the 3rd Infantry Division of Fifth
Corps, conducted an operation in southern Baghdad to capture the
Palestinian terrorist Mohammed Abbas, also known as Abu Abbas. Abbas
was often described as the secretary-general of the Palestine
Liberation Front, the PLF, and was also a key planner of the Achille
Lauro Hijacking in 1985.

Special operations forces, reinforced with conventional forces,
continue to expand security and set conditions for stability in
northern Iraq. Power, water and food are all functional and adequate
in most areas of the north. In four key cities, Dahuk (sp), north of
Mosul, Irbill, Kirkuk, and Sulimaniyah to the east of Kirkuk, all of
these have been assessed as permissive security environments. And
that's an important step that's been made, and it lets humanitarian
action occur with much greater density and activity.

In Mosul, electric power has been disrupted, and there have been
recent incidents of violent civil unrest. Our efforts continue to
lower the tension of over 1.5 million, and to create a permissive
environment there as well. The coalition by -- I'm sorry, the
cooperation by local populations in other areas is again evident in
the discovery of over 2,000 mortar shells and several hundred rockets
in the city of Al-Kut. And these again were pointed out by civilians
in that area.

Direct action missions are ongoing throughout the country to locate
former regime leaders and to search former regime facilities.
Yesterday, and Iraqi intelligence service training facility was
searched by coalition special operations forces and resulted in the
seizure of information and materials which will now be examined in
detail.

As coalition maneuver forces clear more pockets of resistance, they
remain focused on security in urban areas, and the transition to
humanitarian assistance. Fifth Corps continued to attack to cut off
regime escape routes and also secured key Iraqi facilities. Other
Fifth Corps elements continued to secure population centers and key
roads in central and southern Iraq, and supported ongoing humanitarian
assistance operations throughout the zone.

In Al-Ramadi yesterday, an element of the 3rd Infantry Division
accepted the capitulation of the 12th Armor Brigade, regular army,
that was stationed in that area and had been defending the main road
that leads from Jordan into Baghdad. This capitulation reflected
compliance with the coalition instructions of moving into some sort of
formation that would indicate a clear signal that capitulation was the
desire of the command. This had been facilitated already by special
operations forces that had been in contact with the commander of the
formation, and some of their actions included moving vehicles into
administrative parking, reorienting their weapons away from coalition
forces, and in this case they even took additional steps of rendering
some of the combat systems ineffective by removing batteries. Most of
the force had already been released from service, but the commander
had 40 soldiers that remained there to actually guard the equipment in
the garrison. While there still may Ba'ath Party loyalists in
Al-Ramadi, it's clear that the organized resistance there has come to
an end.

The 1st Marine Expeditionary Force maintained the isolation of Baghdad
north along the eastern side of the city, and also continued its
operations within the center of the city, clearing additional zones
and conducting joint patrols with Iraqis. The remaining areas in
Baghdad that have not yet been cleared are all suspected to harbor
armed regime loyalists. Other 1st Marine Expeditionary Force units
continued to secure Tikrit. U.K. forces secured oil facilities in
Al-Kurna (sp), and searched for the remnants of any irregular forces
in the vicinity of Basra.

At this point, all coalition land units are conducting humanitarian
assistance assessments throughout their areas. Coalition forces report
that looting has dramatically reduced throughout the area of
operations, and normal activities are starting to occur.

Loudspeaker teams and radio broadcasts are helping to discourage
looting, as well as to reduce the tolerance of looters. Distribution
of leaflets and handbills like the one that's shown here, focused on
discouraging looting, are also having a favorable effect at this
point. Emerging leaders have also joined in the call for looting to
cease.

Coalition land component units continued several meetings with the
Iraqi leaders regarding critical needs and issues. In a number of
areas, control of infrastructure and the organs of governance are back
in the hands of the Iraqi people. In Al-Amarah, for example, the local
population is already in control of most of the institutions, and the
townspeople are very keen to get back to work and get the schools
reopened, as they already have in Irbill in northern Iraq.

We continue to communicate with the Iraqi people through a number of
different media. Our radio broadcasts are reaching all of Iraq.
Television broadcasts are ongoing from airborne broadcast systems, and
we'll soon broadcast from ground stations. More Iraqis will have
access to these programs as power is restored.

Leaflets, like these that are currently shown, are being distributed
to inform the Iraqis that the former regime is gone, and that Iraq is
now on a path to the future that they will choose.

Our coalition efforts to set the foundation for the future of Iraq are
ongoing. Assessments are taking place, and actions are following to
meet the needs that have been identified. Power remains the root issue
for many humanitarian challenges within Iraq. As we've stated before,
power is necessary to produce or to move fresh water, and this allows
hospitals to function at full capacity, and it also enables certain
types of infrastructure repair. And further, it creates an environment
where life may proceed normally.

I have some images to show of some work done recently at the Dawra
(sp) power plant in Baghdad, where assessments and repairs are
ongoing. Two days ago, coalition forces secured this site. Since then,
coalition engineers and Iraqi power industry experts have had two
on-site meetings, and these were to determine the way ahead in
restoring the station to full function. Concurrent with that work, 200
Iraqi electrical workers returned to work, and the effort to
reestablish power in these areas is ongoing. And as we've said
repeatedly, power and water are systemically linked.

Until power repairs are complete, the coalition continues to
distribute water supplies and assistance in Iraq. These images show
water distribution at a point in Basra. In this case, water is
delivered daily in a suburban area of Basra, as you see here, to local
citizens, and they're very cooperative in ensuring that the process
remains orderly. You can see that they have their own containers --
they're lined up. It's done in a way that I think is a very good
example of interaction and cooperation between the coalition and the
people. At this point, the water system in Basra is functioning at
about 60 percent of the needed capacity, as it was before the war, and
work is ongoing there to raise the system to 100 percent capacity in
the coming weeks.

In some other areas, like As-Zubair, near Basra, 80 percent of the
population now has access to running water. Humanitarian organizations
are providing an additional delivery of bottled water and bulk water
daily in that area.

And as I mentioned in the north, the water system in Kirkuk is
functioning normally, and this should reduce, or ideally eliminate the
need for water deliveries that have been ongoing in the last several
days.

Medical care and public health are also areas receiving coalition
focus. And in many areas, regime forces left public health buildings
in terrible conditions, like this next image shows. Some facilities
have already been restored to readiness, and the next image shows a
coalition military civil affairs team with a public health physician,
a military public health physician, conducting a joint assessment with
Iraqi public health officials in Nasiriyah. Our coalition medical
support efforts continue throughout the country. Medical supplies are
flowing in through Baghdad International and also over land.

Coalition countries and countries from without the coalition are
committing health professionals, supplies and facilities to provide
assistance and relief. Some examples: A medical facility in Umm Qasr
is now supplemented by Kuwait; the Spanish field hospital and
ship-based hospital in the region as well; insulin, children's
vitamins, and bandages are being pushed to the main hospital in
As-Samawa. Qatar sent three pallets of medical supplies and 17 health
professionals, including four doctors just within the last few days.
They arrived at Samman Pak (sp) by coalition C-130, and they will be
transported by ground to the main medical complex in Baghdad. A
medical aid convoy and a Jordanian field hospital crossed into Iraq
this morning, and they'll provide assistance near Baghdad. And also
within Baghdad, water, fuel, pumps and batteries were supplied to
several medical facilities in cooperation with the ICRC.

The coalition is also looking beyond the immediate and day-to-day
needs of the Iraqis to set conditions for a stable environment and
stable government chosen by the Iraqi people. Yesterday, a number of
religious, ethnic and tribal leaders met in the historic and ancient
of Ur -- this was near Nasiriyah -- to discuss the future
administration of Iraq. The meeting had previously been described as
coming into the big tent, and that's an accurate description, as the
next slide shows. In fact, there were two large tents, and I would add
that this particular shot is taken from the top of the Ziggurat at Ur.
And you'll see that more clearly at the end of this short video.

What I want to show you now is the opening remarks delivered by the
facilitator of the meeting, Dr. Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. special
envoy. Let's go ahead and roll the tape.

BEGIN VIDEO CLIP.

DR. ZALMAY KHALILZAD: This is an historic moment for, I'm sure you
realize, for Iraq, an historic opportunity for the Iraqis. I urge you
-- I urge you to take advantage of this opportunity and to establish a
democratic system that fits your circumstance. I have told some of you
some weeks ago that help was on the way for the effort to liberate
Iraq. I hope now you realize that we are delivering on that
commitment. Today I want to make another pledge to you, that we will
be with you until you achieve the goal of -- (inaudible) -- of a
stable, democratic and prosperous Iraq. (Applause.)

END VIDEO CLIP.

GEN. BROOKS: Ladies and gentlemen, I'll take your questions. Yes
please, Tom.

Q: I have two questions, of course. The first being, throughout these
briefings, you have talked about once offensive operations have halted
that you will have more opportunity to visit sites, to have
information provided to you, regarding weapons of mass destruction.
It's my understanding there are more than two or three thousand teams
that are now doing site exploration. Are you finding anything that
would relate to the delivery of weapons of mass destruction, or
instructions, or lack of instructions, to Iraqi soldiers, how to use
them, where to use them -- any kind of training manuals or anything
like that? What are you finding out there on these site explorations?

And secondly, where's General Franks today?

GEN. BROOKS: First, on the WMD, we did organize ourselves to have a
number of teams that could go into sites and do what we refer to as
exploitation, which is really doing a detailed examination to see if
there's the types of things you described -- information, delivery
systems, preparation, storage, or anything else that might pertain to
the program, including information about how they may have been
hidden.

At this point we have a number of teams that are operating out there.
I don't know the exact number of teams that are currently in action at
different sites. What we do have is several things that have been
examined. Some have not proven to be chemical weapons, for example.
Some prove to be agricultural, although they were stored in a way that
would not indicate a normal use for agriculture. But nevertheless, we
determined that those were agricultural products.

We have seen chemical protection-related things in a number of areas,
chemical defense-related items. We certainly have encountered a number
of delivery systems that have been captured or destroyed -- the
Al-Samoud missiles, the Ababil-100 missiles, certain free rockets over
ground -- that are capable of carrying chemical weapons.

But the real heavy-duty work of being able to get into sites and
getting detailed access to people who have knowledge and the
facilities about which they may have knowledge, that's ongoing. And
we're really just in the earliest stages of that.

It is indeed true that as we came close to the cessation of
hostilities, we'd have more and more opportunities and more and more
access. And that's bearing out to be true. But it's very much putting
together pieces of a puzzle, one piece at a time. And when you see the
shape of the one piece, you can see how it may relate to other pieces
that are out there. That's ongoing. It's deliberate work. And we
remain confident in our approach.

General Franks is where he is every day. He's commanding his forces in
a place he believes he needs to be on the battlefield. And that's
about as far as I want to take it.

Yes, please.

Q: General, Paul Adams, BBC. Also two questions. One, just following
on the question of the weapons of mass destruction, the British are
reported to have made a huge discovery of arms, described as 50,000
tons of shells, rockets and explosives near Al-Amara. I just wondered
if you had any detail on that and whether anything there raised
suspicions that anything might have been weaponized with chemical
munitions.

And on Abu Abbas, I'm just wondering why you found it necessary to
devote time and energy to arresting a man who, for the last dozen
years or so, has not been involved, to the best of anyone's knowledge,
in any acts of terrorism, who's actually renounced terrorism and
condemned 9/11; is, in effect, a has-been.

GEN. BROOKS: Well, first, on the incidents near Al-Amara and the
discoveries, we only have preliminary information as to what's coming
in. There have been a number of areas where our exploitation teams
have gone in, beginning out in the west at some of the airfields, and
found massive volumes of ammunition and most of the artillery shells.

Some of those have been preliminarily examined and determined not to
be weaponized. In Al-Amara, we don't know yet. We certainly have more
work to do. There may be some preliminary findings that are made by
forces that are on the ground. If something is worthy of further
examination, then our teams that have the greater capability will
examine those.

If then something is deemed worthy of further examination, then it can
be evacuated to specific laboratory-like testing to determine exactly
what the agent might be, and then we'll make further determination. So
it's very early in the process on Al-Amara. It will be examined, like
many others are at this current time.

Abu Abbas is a terrorist. He was a terrorist. He remains a terrorist.
And he will be viewed as such. Notwithstanding any declarations that
have been made in recent years, his role in terrorism, his links to
terrorist organizations, are abundantly clear.

But perhaps what's more important is he was found in Baghdad. And
we've said for a long time that Baghdad and Iraq and the regime that
no longer exists have harbored terrorists, have provided a safe haven
for terrorists, and in some cases have facilitated the operations of
terrorists.

I think the arrest of Mr. Abbas makes it very clear that that was
true. And we continue to do greater efforts than that in other areas
to find other terrorist links and to eliminate terrorist organizations
that are in Iraq.

Yes, please.

Q: Patrick Mercer (ph) from Agence France Presse. Could you expand a
little bit on what happened in Mosul yesterday? Essentially how many
people were killed, and were they shot by U.S. troops?

Another question on Saddam Hussein. You have said on several occasions
that finding him is not a priority. But at this stage, wouldn't you
agree that not finding him, failure to find him, given his value, his
symbolic value, is a major setback? Thank you.

GEN. BROOKS: Well, we know about the incident that happened in Mosul
on the 15th is still developing. And this, of course, is something
that's under investigation. But preliminary reporting tells us that
coalition Special Operations forces with civil affairs, and reinforced
by some Marines that are also operating in that area of Mosul, went
into a location that they had selected to be used as a regional
coordinating center, a place where people could come and meet and do
the business that's necessary for creating a stable environment. This
building was a former government building, and it also had a retaining
wall around it. And that was one of the reasons why it was chosen.

After the first group entered there, another group of Marines joined
them, and they were encountered by a very large crowd outside of the
complex. The crowd was violent upon their arrival, throwing rocks at
the Marines, hitting them with elbows, hitting them with fists and
spitting on them as they entered the complex.

The Marines entered the complex through that and then took up their
positions to secure the work that was ongoing inside of the complex.
At a later time, the crowd became even more incensed and agitated.

There was an arrival of an ambulance, as reported, that had
loudspeakers on it. The coalition also had a vehicle with
loudspeakers. It was trying to calm the crowd. The ambulance arrived
to incense the crowd. And so it became an agitated crowd that then
turned over a civilian vehicle, set it on fire in the streets, and the
actions became increasingly violent.

The coalition Special Operations forces and Marines observed men with
weapons in and amongst the crowd who were firing in the air. It wasn't
aimed fire. Warning shots were fired by coalition into a field beyond
where the crowd was forming.

Thereafter, fire was directed at the Marines and Special Operations
forces in this complex. It was aimed fire, and aimed fire was then
returned against some of the demonstrators, some of the agitated
persons, who were now climbing over the wall of the compound.

Fire was indeed delivered from coalition forces. It was lethal fire.
And some Iraqis were killed as a result of that. We think the number
was somewhere on the order of seven. And there may have been some
wounded as well. The attacking was occurring from two sides, and it
was clear observation of men with weapons involved in firing on the
building during that time.

The rest of it remains to be examined in detail. We know that the
Marine commander and also the Special Operations commander went to the
scene shortly thereafter. They've done their initial assessments, and
further investigation is underway. And as we have more information,
we'll put that up.

Q: (Off mike.)

GEN. BROOKS: Oh, yes. I'm sorry. As we've stated all along, the
coalition was our target. There are individuals within the coalition.
There are decision-makers within the coalition. There are leaders --
excuse me, within the regime. Pardon me. Let me back up on that.
(Laughter.) There are clearly leaders in the coalition as well.

Within the regime, there were leaders. There was capability. There
were those who might issue orders. And those would be our targets. Now
that the regime has been broken, we are pursuing individuals in order
to completely remove the potential of the regime ever returning and
bringing any of the regime leaders who were responsible for crimes
against their own population and other charges to justice. And so that
work is ongoing.

If we don't find every one of them but we can account that the regime
is not in place, then we have succeeded. We believe that we have
already succeeded in the task of removing the regime. Our efforts
nevertheless will pursue any leads that tell us where any of the
regime leaders might be, and that's really what the effort is.

So we're comfortable that we've been very successful in our efforts to
date, and we anticipate we'll have more success now in the secondary
actions of policing (of?) individuals.

Yes, ma'am, please.

Q: (Inaudible) -- about Abu Abbas. Could you explain to us how he was
captured, please?

GEN. BROOKS: Without getting too specific about the capture of Mr.
Abbas, I would tell you that we had information that was credible. It
was cross-checked, and it was therefore able to be acted upon. We had
coalition Special Operations forces and conventional forces who
quickly organized, moved into the area where the reports were that he
might be found, and he was essentially captured at that point in time.

I won't be specific about how we find pieces of information like that,
but let me say simply that we have good information that leads us to
action, and that action in this case was fruitful. That's really how
it worked.

Yes, please.

Q: I'd like to talk for a second about another Abbas, this little boy,
12-year-old boy, Ali Abbas. He's become, to some extent, a symbol for
the civilians who have been hurt in this war. Can you elaborate on
what the U.S. has done to try and help him? And in what context should
we look at his situation? And do you know any more about how he
obtained his injuries? Thank you.

GEN. BROOKS: What we do know at this point, first, is that it's our
understanding that he has been successfully evacuated to Kuwait and is
receiving medical treatment. And that's very good news for him. And we
certainly congratulate Kuwait on being able to take him in.

We offered our assistance to transport him. I believe, in fact, he was
moved by a humanitarian organization, which is again good news that
they can move in places of the country and provide unique and focused
aid.

What remains our concentration and how I would put it into context is
there are a number of civilians, there are a number of children, who
are in need of medical treatment and who are receiving medical
treatment. We, in our approach, have provided medical care to any that
we've encountered, no matter what the circumstances are, no matter
where we find them on the battlefield. And that continues to be our
effort and our focus.

More medical aid is coming in to make it possible for more to be
treated in a variety of areas. We know that some of the hospitals are
overwhelmed at the current time, and most of them are operating at
some sort of reduced capacity either because of a lack of supplies, a
lack of water or a lack of power. And so we facilitate as much as
possible, not only our own efforts but the efforts of others, to
provide as much relief as can be done.

I have no knowledge at all as to how he may have been injured at this
point, but the good news is he's in a place where he can receive some
great care. That's what we know.

Yes, please.

Q: Hi. Donna Leinwand (sp) from USA Today. You were mentioning the
meeting yesterday in Ur. One of the things that the Iraqis talked
about extensively was the security issue. That seems to be one of the
top things on their agenda. And, in fact, it was one of their
principles.

They said that they felt that it was the coalition's responsibility to
help them to quell the violence, to quell the looting. And they didn't
seem to be satisfied with U.S. efforts so far. They, in fact, said
that some of the looting went on under the noses of coalition troops.
Could you explain to me what you feel the U.S. responsibility is for
security?

GEN. BROOKS: We want to create an environment, Donna, that allows
security to continue not just by coalition forces but by the
population itself. Looting was done by Iraqis. That's the bottom line.
And so it was really done under the noses of the Iraqi population.

The good news is, at this point in time, many Iraqis are saying this
is unacceptable behavior. The coalition is also saying it's
unacceptable behavior. We believe that we have to create an
environment that security is felt by the population and security
indeed does exist. But that's done in partnership. It's not done by
imposing a regime-like imposition on the population itself.

We certainly are aware of our responsibilities. We believe we're
fulfilling our responsibilities very well. We also are focused on
eliminating remaining pockets of regime resistance and regime
loyalists. And that, of course, as we entered into Baghdad, where a
lot of the attention was focused, was our primary concern. We still
(had?) forces in contact. There are a number of areas that had not
been cleared. And there are even today still some areas that have not
been cleared that we know may harbor some violent people. And so
that's really where it goes.

Security is something that's created throughout by presence, by the
approach we take, and, very importantly, by the cooperation that comes
from the Iraqi population themselves. And we've seen a significant
downturn in the conditions that existed when liberation first came to
Baghdad, as we knew it would.

And we're confident that in time, as time passes and more institutions
are restored, that the incidents of violence will go down even further
and incidents of lawlessness. So we remain confident in the direction
we're headed.

Yes.

Q: Thank you, sir. Since American officials began issuing their
admonitions towards the Syrian regime about a week and a half ago now,
have you seen a decrease in the amount of interference by the Syrians
in this war?

And my second question is, now that the major military operations are
over, is this now a time for the coalition forces to begin
investigating claims made by some Iraqis of errant bombings, killing
of civilians by accident by American forces and coalition forces?
Thank you, sir.

GEN. BROOKS: What we've seen is, since we've been positioned in areas
where there's not free movement across borders, that we have had an
impact on the movement across the borders. That's the first
observation we have, and certainly there has been a reduction in
recent weeks really of any cross-border movement by young men who are
volunteering to fight. Some of the movements, as I mentioned before,
were from east to west, leaving Iraq, particularly after there were
some significant battles against third-country persons that were
reportedly volunteering to fight. And so that has gone down.

What role the national level discussions are in that I can't speculate
on. I am certain there is some impact, but I can't characterize
exactly what that is. So it takes a combination of these things to
cause the movement back in forth to come to a lower amount than it was
before.

Our operations are not complete. The decisive combat actions are
coming to a close, and at this point our military actions primarily
are focused against pockets that are still out there. There are still
areas we have not been in throughout Iraq that we need to physically
go to first to ensure that there is no regime loyalists there, or to
remove any pockets if anyone chooses to still follow the old ways of
the regime.

Investigations are really secondary -- much -- frankly, they may be
much further down than that. I think we'll, as we get information that
information will be gathered. But it's not a primary focus at this
point in time when we have humanitarian issues to address, we have the
establishment of good governance going into place, and we have the
transitioning of the force from one area into another, and also the
standing up of the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian
Assistance in close cooperation with the coalition forces. That's
where our efforts are right now. We think we ought to be oriented on
that, not trying to determine whether or not any surface-to-air
missiles that went up came back down in Baghdad, and what impact they
may have had.

Yes, please?

Q: James Forlong from Sky News. General, there have been reports that
Abu Abbas tried to flee to Syria and was turned back at the border by
the Syrian authorities. Presumably you would applaud the actions of
the Syrian authorities in doing that?

And, secondly, could you tell me when does General Franks intend to
visit Baghdad?

GEN. BROOKS: Good question. (Laughter.) First, we understand that Mr.
Abbas tried to move a number of times, and did not succeed in escaping
from Iraq. And, more importantly, he did not succeed in escaping from
the reach of the coalition forces. For a has-been, he sure had
difficulty getting to neighboring countries, and so we certainly think
that others also, like the coalition, view him as a terrorist. He was
and he is. That's what we know about that, and I certainly don't want
to comment on specifically where he might have been, or what decisions
were made by bordering countries on letting him in or not.

And I believe General Franks will probably visit Baghdad very soon.
Thanks very much.

In the back please.

Q: About Abu Abbas again. A PLO spokesman was saying today that
according to the Oslo Accords no member of the PLO could be arrested
or tried for crimes committed prior to September 13th, 1993. Could you
comment on that? And also about the fact that the U.S. canceled their
long-standing arrest warrant for Abu Abbas in recent years?

GEN. BROOKS: I don't have any knowledge on the accord you described. I
am certain that the lawyers will take over and decide exactly what
actions ought to be taken with Mr. Abbas from here on out. Our role
was to remove terrorists from Iraq and break the terrorist connections
that exist within Iraq. He is part of that terrorist connection, that
terrorist network, and any decisions that are made from here, we will
simply comply with the instructions that are given to us. But right
now he's off the table as a terrorist, and we are certain of that.

Yes, please? The second half of your question was -- repeat it again,
please?

Q: Has the U.S. canceled their arrest warrant for Abu Abbas?

GEN. BROOKS: I just don't have any knowledge on that. So we know that
he was here. We found him. He couldn't escape. We took him into our
custody. And at this point the lawyers will tell us what comes next.

Yes, please?

Q: Nicole Winfield from Associated Press. Is General Franks in
Baghdad? Has he been in Baghdad today? Will he be in Baghdad today?

Second question, following up on the Mosul incident, you said that
Marines fired on I guess where -- the people who were firing on
Marines, or were the Marines firing on these people who were coming
over the wall toward them? Just a slight difference. And do you know
if any of the people that you -- that were killed were actually the
people who were firing on you? Were they armed, et cetera? Or were
these the unarmed people who were coming over the wall toward the
Marines?

GEN. BROOKS: As a matter of practice, we don't comment on exactly
where the commander is located at any given time, and so I am not
going to comment on it today.

In Mosul, what we know about it -- again, it's still developing
information that has to be investigated thoroughly -- is what we saw
essentially was supporting fires, so fires were being delivered by
people with weapons outside of the wall while people were scaling the
wall. That's how you do an assault.

In one case we know there was certainly a person with an AK-47 behind
the building who was running across an open area who was shot, and he
was shot in the legs. As to the other ones, how many were armed coming
over the wall or not, I don't know, but it was clearly an assault as
we see it right now. And that's -- the rest of the story we'll have to
see as time goes on.

Yes, please?

Q: (Off mike) -- Network. Could you tell me about the Baghdad
International Airport? Has it been clean? When the first civilian
flight is going to land?

GEN. BROOKS: Baghdad International is a very, very busy place with
military support activity and also with the flow of humanitarian
supplies. There are still some threats in the area, so we haven't had
commercial aircraft per se to land in there. We have used military
aircraft provided by the coalition because of some of their protective
countermeasures in the event that someone does try to get a shot at an
aircraft. And so that's more for insurance as much as anything else.

The important thing right now is that it is very busy with multiple
short tons of humanitarian supplies and assistance -- mostly medical
-- flowing into Baghdad International, being pushed out of that key
gateway to the future that I described before, and pushed out to the
Iraqi people for use. As the security environment improves, as we have
greater certainty that there's not someone out on the approach with a
surface-to-air missile, then certainly commercial flights themselves
we anticipate will resume. There's not a fixed date for that. It's
when we believe the conditions are right.

So for right now we are playing it safe on who can fly in and why they
would fly in. It's still a military facility under military control.
Aircraft runways are active, at least for the types of aircraft we
have, and our efforts are ongoing to improve that so that it can be
used by other aircraft in due time.

Yes, please?

Q: General, Pete Smallowitz from Knight Ridder. I know that the
cross-border movement with Syria has been controlled since you have
sent some forces there. But that didn't happen until after the first
week of the war or so. Why wasn't that done sooner, given reports that
Saddam might try to escape there and other movements across the border
might occur?

GEN. BROOKS: Well, Pete, before the war started we were operating
under a different set of rules of engagement. We certainly were not
under combat rules that would let us penetrate, enter any place we
chose inside of Iraq. We had to rely on governments to make choices
about who would cross their borders at that point in time, and
certainly where were some options available to all the bordering
countries of Iraq during that time, and even to the present those
choices still exist. Once we had the ability to position forces, we
rapidly moved Special Operations forces into a position where they
could influence movement of ballistic missile systems, of regime
leaders trying to escape, or any reinforcement of units to or from
Baghdad in the west. So that's really how our operations unfolded.
We've maintained a presence out there. That presence has increased
over time to cover more and more areas, and that's really where we
stand at the current time: able to respond to movements that are going
out with a variety of mechanisms -- physical presence, also
surveillance of varying sorts. And we'll continue in those efforts
until we are satisfied that the borders really are indeed controlled
and the right decisions are being made and no regime leaders can
escape.

Paul, please.

Q: Hi, it's Paul Hunter, from Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. You
haven't shown any videos the last few days of the, you know, the
laser-guided missiles and things like that. Are we to take it then
that the aerial bombardment has ended? And, secondarily, can you give
us some kind of ratio comparing like the amount of time, energy and
resources the coalition is putting into direct military activity --
like soldiers with guns shooting things -- versus everything else --
the humanitarian search for chemical weapons, the -- all the other
stuff going on? Like is it 80-20 the other way now? How would you
characterize it?

GEN. BROOKS: Clearly the air operations have gone down in terms of the
kinetic activity that's ongoing. There are still close-air support
missions. There is close-air support available to forces that are
still maneuvering out there on the battlefield that are seeking places
where there might still be some regime presence, places where we don't
have capitulations yet. And so that continues. And so we always have
an air presence that is associated with that.

The number of kinetic munitions that have been delivered has gone down
significantly. There never was a bombardment. There were always
precision engagements that were done, even in populated areas like
Baghdad. And now that people have access to it, they should be able to
see for themselves that they are regime complexes and regime buildings
and some dual-use buildings that were used by the regime for
commercial purposes and also military or regime command and control
purposes that were very precisely struck. And so the traditional image
of a capital city at the end of war after a force has entered that
city -- it doesn't match the reality of what exists right now in
Baghdad.

Having said that, the current mixture of our work is local combat
activity. All of our formations still remain armed. They still remain
protected with postures that their commanders determine in terms of
body armor, helmets, et cetera. That's a local decision made by
commanders based on their assessment of their situation. They are
always in that mode first, which is establishing and maintaining
security. Secondarily, they focus on other work.

So some may be oriented on clearing zones in Baghdad that have not yet
been cleared, that we think may harbor some people who still want to
fight. Others -- other parts of the formation may be oriented on
delivering humanitarian assistance in places that were just cleared
within the last few days. Some are escorting assessment teams that are
looking for how do we get these power plants back on line, how do you
get the water pumps restored? What kind of generator repair parts do
you need at these hospitals that have generators to at least give them
50 percent capacity? I'm not sure what the mix is. But it really is a
dynamic action that occurs inside tactical formations on a day-to-day
basis, and our forces are flexible enough, our formations are agile
enough and our people are disciplined enough to deliver supplies in an
hour, and vice versa, or deliver supplies, get in a fight on the way,
do whatever is necessary to protect the force, eliminate any
resistance and continue delivering the medical supplies. That requires
a highly trained, highly disciplined, highly agile force, and that's
exactly what's on the ground in this coalition.

Yes, sir, please?

Q: (Off mike) -- London. A couple of questions. First of all, you
talked about the meeting in Nasiriyah yesterday. I know one or two
groups, notably SKIRI (ph) for example, didn't show up, although they
were invited. But of other groups, did you invite everybody? I have in
mind for example the Shiite Dawa (ph) Party and the Communist Party
whose guy showed up at eight in the morning and said he wasn't allowed
in. In other words, was every possible group invited?

And my other question is you said several times this week that there
are parts of the country you haven't been in yet, parts of Iraq you
haven't been in. Could you give us some idea of where those parts of
the country are?

GEN. BROOKS: First, the attendees at the conference themselves
acknowledged that not every organization and every interest was
represented at that meeting. This was the first meeting, a very
important meeting. What's most significant about it is such meetings
like this would not have occurred a month and a half ago, where
different opinions could be expressed on what the future of Iraq
should be, and what role each party might play. This was historic, it
was momentous and it was significant.

There will be other meetings, and there will be choices made by other
parties as to whether they want to participate, how they would
participate. We certainly would expect that if anyone comes to a
meeting in the future it would be in a constructive way, not in a
disruptive way. And I think that's the nature of the invitation that
goes out as time goes on.

Your second question, if you can prompt me on that again please?

Q: (Off mike)?

GEN. BROOKS: Yes, thank you very much. All it takes is usually one
word to get me back on track. There are parts in the northwest where
we haven't had conventional forces move. We have had Special
Operations forces that have established checkpoints, or they passed
through areas or maintained surveillance on areas. In some cases it
requires going physically to towns, like Ar Ramady (ph). We certainly
have observed Ar Ramady (ph), and we've conducted kinetic operations
against formations in Ar Ramady (ph), and we have maintained
surveillance of Ar Ramady (ph). But we hadn't physically gone there.
And by physically going there we had the capitulation of an armored
brigade. So things like that. We had similar activities in Al Amara a
few days ago. Now that we have had formations pass through there, the
formations in Al Amara turned and went to Al Kut, which was initially
isolated, bypassed to the west, and then we proceeded on to Baghdad.
Many of the formations there, when they saw the successes in Baghdad,
and also as we destroyed some of their forces through air action and
some direct action, left the battlefield. What else is there? We've
got to physically go look, and that's ongoing right now. We find Al
Kut is headed in the right direction. And there are other areas that
are like that as well. So in virtually any pocket that we have not
been to or have not applied adequate presence to yet, even if we
passed through there once already, we'll go to each one of them in a
very deliberate way.

Yes, please?

Q: If we could talk about WMD again for a moment, do you have any
indications that any of the units that have capitulated had in their
possession chemical gear, gas masks and so forth? Did any of the units
that you have defeated show on the battlefield any evidence that they
were in possession of those sorts of things? And, if not, and if after
several thousand POWs and even some leaders are in your custody, if
they are not providing evidence to lead you to those weapons, doesn't
it suggest that the weapons were not readily available for use?

GEN. BROOKS: I think the only thing we can conclude at this point is
that the information we have has guided us to some different places.
The people that have been taken into our custody had knowledge of
things. But understand that this is a very, very compartmented program
that only certain key regime leaders had the key to the puzzle on. And
so while there may have been some commanders of depots out in the
west, for example, that said, there's bunkers in here that I don't
know what is contained -- even I didn't have access to it -- we have
entered some of those. In some cases we find documents, we find
information. In some cases we find nothing there anymore. But it's a
piece of the puzzle.

As we find units on the battlefield, we've certainly encountered
protective chemical protective equipment -- atropine injectors that
were purchased under the oil-for-food program, a number of other
things that indicated a readiness for operating in a
chemically-contaminated environment, and we don't use chemicals. So
that reinforces that someone expected that there might be chemical use
on the battlefield.

And then so beyond that each one of these pieces is put back together.
We move to different areas where things are buried. We've uncovered
them, done some initial examination -- found other things that are
buried that have yet to be excavated, and that work is ongoing. It's a
very deliberate process. It requires diligence, focus and good
information, and that information has to be harvested from different
sources over time.

Q: (Off mike) -- individually with various Iraqi soldiers?

GEN. BROOKS: I think we've seen some of both. To my knowledge we have
seen combinations of that -- some equipment in possession of soldiers
and paramilitaries and certainly stocks hospitals commonly, or in
schools and other places. As time goes on, we will find more and more
of these things. The buried and hidden items I think will be where the
significant findings will be. But we have to go through them one by
one as we get each lead and do deliberate, examining work on each
piece of information we find.

Yes, sir, please?

Q: (Off mike.) Going back to the civilian sort of thing, there were
civilian houses that were struck whether it was by mistake,
misinformation, inaccuracy, or due to the existence of some sort of
resistance within these areas. We understand that the reconstruction
will go to the government buildings. But for those civilians who had
nothing but these houses and these homes that were destroyed somehow
by the bombardment, would there be some sort of compensation? That's
one question.

The other is we have seen some of the vehicles that were in the
warehouse of -- (inaudible) -- that were taken to reinforce the means
of transportation for some troops. Will there be an investigation on
that?

GEN. BROOKS: Let me start with the second question. I am not familiar
with the reports on that. And anything that we use for practical
purposes there is a practical need for it. We are not going to leave
the country with something like that. We want to try to provide as
much support to the Iraqi population as we can, but sometimes you have
to commandeer things on the battlefield just to get something moved. I
don't know if that circumstance has occurred or not, so I wouldn't
want to speculate as to the specifics of what you have referred to.

We certainly know there have been civilians impacted by war. Our
approach has been to be very deliberate in our targeting and very
deliberate in our actions, to prevent bombardments, to ensure that
there was not indiscriminate action. But we know that the population
was exposed significantly and deliberately by the regime, by the
former regime, and certainly some populations have been affected by
that.

I think as our work goes on and we make assessments, some of the work
that can be done will include food, water, medical -- all these things
we've talked about -- repairing infrastructure, getting good
governance in place. Part of good governance means taking care of the
people who were affected in area. How that will unfold I certainly
cannot predict at this point in time. But we know we have got an
Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance that will focus
on those types of issues, the whole scope of issues related to the
reconstruction and assistance of people in Iraq. And we also know that
the Iraqi government, whatever form it takes in the future, will focus
on its people. That's what we want to see -- something that takes care
of the population, where everyone has representation. We believe it
will develop in that way right now.

I don't have specific information for you on exactly what methods or
what measures will be taken for individuals affected.

Q: (Off mike) -- civilian buildings that were hit?

GEN. BROOKS: I honestly don't know what the specific method will be.
That would be something that certainly will be addressed by the Office
of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance. They'll address any and
all questions that come to them, and decisions will then be made as to
where compensations should be, what would be appropriate, and what
actions might be taken to provide that assistance.

Let me take one more question. Sir, in the back, please.

Q: (Off mike) -- from Kuwait TV. General, do you think that there is a
possibility to establish a unit or liaison office in conjunction with
the Kuwaiti authorities to coordinate the efforts towards finding
Kuwaiti prisoners of war?

GEN. BROOKS: I think that virtually any method that helps us to gain
the release of anyone that is yet unaccounted for is an appropriate
approach. We remain interested in ensuring that all who are
unaccounted for are accounted for when it's all said and done. We know
the Kuwaiti government is very concerned about those who have remained
unaccounted for for a number of years, and we are certainly in a
position to provide assistance where we can within our means,
consistent with the operations we already have ongoing to find those
that have been lost. And so just as we have cooperated with the
Kuwaiti government, and other governments on a variety of issues --
whether it's getting water into the port of Umm Qasr to be
distributed, or whether it's the movement of humanitarian supplies, or
movement of medical personnel, with all the governments that have an
interest in doing the right thing for populations, we remain available
and ready to assist how we can.

Thanks very much.

(end transcript)

(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)